Evaluation of the Surgical Margin: An Issue of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinics
The surgical margin is a critical aspect of surgical oncology, as it plays a significant role in determining the outcome of the surgery. The surgical margin is the distance between the edge of the resected tissue and the nearest tumor cells. A clear surgical margin is defined as the absence of tumor cells at the edge of the resected tissue, while a close or involved surgical margin indicates the presence of tumor cells at the edge of the resected tissue.
The evaluation of the surgical margin is essential for assessing the adequacy of the surgical resection and for predicting the risk of local recurrence. A clear surgical margin is associated with a lower risk of local recurrence, while a close or involved surgical margin is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence.
5 out of 5
Language | : | English |
File size | : | 120124 KB |
Text-to-Speech | : | Enabled |
Screen Reader | : | Supported |
Enhanced typesetting | : | Enabled |
Print length | : | 423 pages |
Methods of Evaluating the Surgical Margin
There are a number of methods that can be used to evaluate the surgical margin. The most common method is histopathological examination, which involves examining the resected tissue under a microscope to determine the presence or absence of tumor cells. Other methods include cytological examination, which involves examining cells from the resected tissue, and molecular biological techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR),which can be used to detect the presence of tumor-specific DNA or RNA.
Factors Affecting the Surgical Margin
The surgical margin is affected by a number of factors, including the size and location of the tumor, the type of surgery performed, and the skill of the surgeon. The size and location of the tumor can affect the difficulty of achieving a clear surgical margin. Tumors that are large or located in close proximity to critical structures may be more difficult to resect with a clear surgical margin. The type of surgery performed can also affect the surgical margin. Some surgical procedures, such as Mohs micrographic surgery, are designed to achieve a clear surgical margin by removing the tumor tissue in thin layers and examining the edges of the resected tissue under a microscope. The skill of the surgeon is also an important factor in achieving a clear surgical margin. Surgeons who are experienced in performing a particular type of surgery are more likely to achieve a clear surgical margin.
Consequences of a Close or Involved Surgical Margin
A close or involved surgical margin is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. Local recurrence is the reappearance of the tumor in the same area where it was originally removed. Local recurrence can occur if tumor cells are left behind at the edge of the resected tissue. The risk of local recurrence is higher if the surgical margin is close or involved.
Management of a Close or Involved Surgical Margin
The management of a close or involved surgical margin depends on the specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, it may be necessary to perform additional surgery to remove the remaining tumor cells. In other cases, it may be necessary to administer radiation therapy or chemotherapy to kill any remaining tumor cells. The decision of how to manage a close or involved surgical margin should be made by a multidisciplinary team of specialists, including surgeons, oncologists, and radiation therapists.
The evaluation of the surgical margin is an essential aspect of surgical oncology. A clear surgical margin is associated with a lower risk of local recurrence, while a close or involved surgical margin is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. The management of a close or involved surgical margin depends on the specific circumstances of the case.
References
1. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2017. 2. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):77-89. 3. Rice TW, Gimotty PA, Munzenrider JE, et al. The surgical margin in head and neck cancer: a critical review. Head Neck. 2015;37(1):1-10. 4. Adelstein DJ, Gillison ML, Begum S, et al. The impact of surgical margin status on outcome in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with primary surgery. Cancer. 2014;120(19):3006-3013. 5. Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Ashtekar A, et al. The surgical margin in thyroid cancer: a systematic review. Thyroid. 2015;25(1):1-10.
5 out of 5
Language | : | English |
File size | : | 120124 KB |
Text-to-Speech | : | Enabled |
Screen Reader | : | Supported |
Enhanced typesetting | : | Enabled |
Print length | : | 423 pages |
Do you want to contribute by writing guest posts on this blog?
Please contact us and send us a resume of previous articles that you have written.
Light bulbAdvertise smarter! Our strategic ad space ensures maximum exposure. Reserve your spot today!
- Tyler NelsonFollow ·5.2k
- Amir SimmonsFollow ·5.2k
- Cruz SimmonsFollow ·14.8k
- Ken SimmonsFollow ·10.7k
- Heath PowellFollow ·2.8k
- Bret MitchellFollow ·7.2k
- Colin RichardsonFollow ·14.2k
- Jamie BlairFollow ·17.8k
Heal Your Multiple Sclerosis: Simple And Delicious...
Are you looking for a...
Myles Garrett: The Unstoppable Force
From Humble Beginnings Myles Garrett's...
Discover the Wonders of Weather with My Little Golden...
My Little Golden...
Kawaii Easy Sudoku Puzzles For Beginners: Unleashing Your...
Immerse Yourself...
Get Started in Stand-Up Comedy: Teach Yourself
Have you...
Challenge Your Mind: Test Your Chess Skills with an...
Are you ready to embark on a...
5 out of 5
Language | : | English |
File size | : | 120124 KB |
Text-to-Speech | : | Enabled |
Screen Reader | : | Supported |
Enhanced typesetting | : | Enabled |
Print length | : | 423 pages |